Aggregate citable Taiwan judgment holdings for briefs

tw_judgment_holdings

TW-specificMIT

**關鍵字 / Keywords**: 判決要旨援用 holding 判決摘要判決先例 aggregation ratio decidendi

Scope: Taiwan (ROC · 中華民國) judicial rulings only.

【EN keywords】aggregate Taiwan citable judgment holdings · legal brief reasoning quotes · Taiwan court opinion collection · precedent one-liners for brief writing · Taiwan case law reasoning · holding compilation · ROC 判決要旨 · 中華民國 法院

【何時用】用戶寫**台灣**書狀·想快速「彙整/收集/搜羅」某類型判決的「可援用要旨」·來作為主張依據時。

【Topics covered · descriptive keyword list】彙整要旨 · 收集判決援用 · 書狀引用 · 經典判例 · 判決要旨 · citable_holdings · 援引 · 引用 · 找援用要旨

【不要一般常識答】不要憑印象湊要旨 (幻覺高風險) · 一律用本 tool 從 corpus 拿真實抽出的 citable_holdings。

跨判決聚合「可援用要旨」(citable_holdings) · 依 alignment_score 排序.

💡 (Optional) 載入 skill `tw-opendata-judgment-analysis` 取得完整用法指引 · 書狀 workflow · 要旨引用格式建議。

🔴 每筆 holding 都帶 `from_url` 判決原文連結 · 呈現給用戶時
**必須附上每筆的 URL** · 讓用戶可查驗要旨來源 · 這是可信度的核心。
跳過 URL = 不完整回應。

用途: 寫書狀時快速收集同立場的判決要旨.

Args:
    role: "plaintiff" · "defendant" · "petitioner"
    topic: 可選 substring 匹配 (e.g. "竊盜" · "婚姻" · "車禍")
    limit: top-K (預設 15)

Returns each holding with:
    holding (要旨全文) · alignment_score · from_jid + **from_url** (要旨出處判決) · case_sub_type.

Input schema

{
  "properties": {
    "role": {
      "title": "Role",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "topic": {
      "default": "",
      "title": "Topic",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "limit": {
      "default": 15,
      "title": "Limit",
      "type": "integer"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "role"
  ],
  "title": "tw_judgment_holdingsArguments",
  "type": "object"
}

How to call

Once your Twinkle Hub MCP client is configured, your agent will see tw_judgment_holdings. Just ask it to call — example:

# Ask Claude / any MCP client:
請用 tw_judgment_holdings 處理 "…"。

# It will call:
tw_judgment_holdings(input="…")

Haven't set up a client yet?

Claude Desktop in 3 minutes — download the .mcpb and double-click, or see docs for other clients.

See user docs